I am a fellow Christ-Follower from Boulder County Colorado. I am starting to develop some small group and sunday school adult curriculum and liked the name ‘KindgomView’ for a general branding thing… and I’ve read you blog and your stuff would be good ad a guest blogger for what I’ve got in mind. I’d like to create a website that offers all kinds of resources… You are the only person I have found using this term that I also thought of… was wondering if you were OK with someone else using it for a similar purpose, etc. and/or interested in being a guest blogger…I hope to connect soon. In Christ, Ken Allen
hi i am Kandumbu, a theology student i like what you are doing and may the Lord be with you
Hello Prof. Torres! This is Jonathan Perez your former Bible Doctrine student. Just saying “hello” and praying for blessings upon you and your wife!
Take care and hold on to the drawings!
I’m surprised by your comments on my view of rewards. I assume you read the next paragraph, in which I advocate the concept of rewards – intrinsic rewards. I oppose those who – like the ruler of Matthew 19 – want to do something to put God in his debt, as if our own effort could earn God’s favor and reward. But God certainly rewards his people – above all with his presence. I say this explicitly several times in my commentary on Matthew – see 2:400-401, for example
Thank you for the reply Dr. Doriani. I’ll pass your comments on to the author.
Thank you again for showing me that there is more grace than wrath within the OT. I love your approach to the Word. My view of the OT has been forever changed. I am looking forward to our future studies.
Matt, thank you again for your kind words. They are both incredibly humbling and a great encouragement.
I’d like to see you review Mitch Stokes’s Shot of Faith to the Head (aka “Plantinga for Dummies”).
MF, thanks for the comment. I don’t have the book you’re referring to (though I have heard good things about it). Generally, I’m pretty favorable toward Plantinga’s approach, though I haven’t written too much on it. Here are some of my thoughts on his Reformed Epistemology I wrote a few years back (part 1, 2, 3).
Thanks, I’ll check those out. I saw this review of Plantinga’s recent book by atheist philosopher Thomas Nagel.
Interestingly, there is substantial agreement that many atheists wouldn’t grant. The ending seems like he’s setting up his own new book Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False
Joseph my workmate! I’m so blessed to be next door to you at work. I’m a big (closet) fan of yours!
Joseph Torres, WOW, such a small, small world we live in. It seems like it has been ages and such vast different times; it was over 16 years ago we knew each other in that most fascinating of work places, Christian Publication. I was that young guy fresh off the streets who was just converted at TSC (Wilkerson’s church). Long story short tons has changed, I’m married, 3 kids, lived all over the globe etc etc etc. 5 yrs ago I became reformed-ish and now I am pretty reformed as an OPC member and studying at Westminster Theological Seminary. Any way, bro, I was working on some Van Til type stuff and was browsing the web and, some how, I came across a write up of yours. I clicked on your name to see who you were and if you were solid 😉 and to my surprise, I totally remembered you by your photo. Again, small world, I hope is well, seems your theology has significantly changed since I last new you. Blessings, I would love to catch up some time. Peace and grace. Patrick K
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Google account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Twitter account.
( Log Out /
You are commenting using your Facebook account.
( Log Out /
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.